PR review
A focused review thread can be part of shipping, not just another browser visit.
Engineering work moves through IDEs, terminals, GitHub, docs, Slack, and browser research. drifty captures that context automatically, then helps classify which switches supported the task and which ones pulled you away.
A real implementation block can move from editor to terminal to docs to GitHub and back again. App-level totals flatten that into noise. drifty keeps the context visible so the review is about intent, not just which window was active.
These are the moments a simple app timer usually misreads.
A focused review thread can be part of shipping, not just another browser visit.
Docs, Stack Overflow, and tutorials can be useful during a bug investigation and drift once the task is done.
Slack can support coordination during a release and become reactive checking after the decision is made.
No. drifty starts from automatic Mac activity capture, then uses classification to make the day easier to review after the work happens.
Yes. The point is context. Docs, tutorials, and issue threads can be focus when they support the current task, and drift when they turn into unrelated browsing.
No. drifty is for understanding attention and time patterns. It can make engineering days easier to explain, but it is not a ticket tracker or billing ledger.
Use automatic Mac tracking and AI classification to see where deep work held, where context helped, and where drift formed.