What we asked
We ran a first-party survey to understand how people think about screen time across phones, desktops, and laptops. Respondents came from South Korea, North America, Europe, Tonga, Hong Kong, and the United States.
This is a directional sample, not a claim about the entire internet. It is useful because the same themes kept appearing across different ages and countries: people already know they spend a lot of time on screens, but current tools often fail to explain whether that time was useful, intentional, or draining.
Insight 1: awareness is not the same as behavior change
Most respondents were not ignoring the problem. 86% said they had tried to reduce smartphone or desktop/laptop usage, and 71% said they often or very often felt they had wasted time after using their devices.
That matters because many screen time products assume the first step is awareness. But the survey suggests awareness already exists. The harder gap is translating awareness into a different choice at the moment of use.
One respondent described the gap clearly: “It’s difficult for me to stay accountable with my screen time, even when I set daily limits on social media.”
Insight 2: people are surrounded by screen time tools, but they do not rely on them
More than half of respondents, 51%, said they hardly ever use Screen Time or Digital Well-being features. At the same time, 57% said current screen time features are not very helpful or not helpful at all for actual behavior change.
The sharpest signal came from people who do use these tools occasionally or frequently. Among that group, every respondent rated current tools as only slightly helpful, not very helpful, or not helpful at all. In other words, usage does not necessarily mean trust.
The open-ended responses pointed to the same issue in plain language: “Not enough details in usage.”
Insight 3: the same app can be useful and distracting
The strongest product insight was about mixed-use apps and websites. 78% agreed or strongly agreed that their purpose varies even within the same application. YouTube can be a lecture, a tutorial, a music player, or Shorts. Reddit can be research or avoidance. A browser tab can be work or drift.
One respondent summed up the problem: “Screen time apps can be hard to use because ... sometimes an app that is distracting can also be essential for learning/working.”
This is why domain-level or app-level totals can feel accurate but still unhelpful. “You spent 42 minutes on YouTube” is a fact. It is not yet an explanation.
Insight 4: users want quality, not just quantity
When we asked whether current features explain the quality of usage, 35% said they hardly explain it or do not explain it at all. That number becomes more interesting next to another result: 75% said categorizing activity inside the same app into learning, information, and entertainment is necessary or very necessary.
The most requested feature was not another raw timer. It was productive vs. unproductive distinction, selected by 37 respondents. The next strongest requests were personalized insights with 34 selections, usage pattern reports with 23, and analysis of usage quality with 20.
Several responses described the same need from different angles: wanting objective data on the home screen, wanting to block Shorts or chosen sites, wanting less algorithmic drift after a single search, and wanting a clearer picture of when time disappears across work, entertainment, study, information, and rest.
Insight 5: intent-aware tracking has clear demand
When asked whether they would use a feature that categorizes activity within the same app, 81% said they would likely or definitely use it. Among respondents who already agreed that purpose varies inside the same app, 80% said they would likely or definitely use that kind of feature.
This does not mean every user wants aggressive blocking. The data points to something more nuanced: people want a tool that can help them see the difference between learning and drifting, research and rabbit holes, intentional rest and automatic scrolling.
What this means for drifty
The survey reinforced the reason drifty focuses on browser-first, website-level understanding. Many products can tell you how much time passed. Fewer tools help explain whether that time matched your intention.
For drifty, the important design challenge is not simply “block more things.” It is to make browser time easier to understand: which websites pulled you in, which sessions were productive, which patterns repeat, and where a mixed-use site changed from useful to distracting.
That is the gap this first-party research made clearer. People are not only asking for less screen time. They are asking for better feedback about the time they already spend.
Related reading